ChatGPT has long held the top position in terms of the AI landscape in 2023. Due to the AI chatbot’s extraordinary talents, this straightforward website has become a daily bookmark for millions of people. Google, on the other hand, has long been waiting in the shadows with its own ChatGPT rival. Google Bard AI is now officially available to a small number of customers after months of waiting. We chose to compare the features of Google Bard and ChatGPT side by side since we were one of the fortunate few to have access. Thus, if you’re interested in learning about the key distinctions between these AI bots and viewing them in action, keep reading.
How Do Bard AI and ChatGPT Compare?
While we will be contrasting these AI chatbots with predetermined prompts, we will first point out their main distinctions. Use the table below to move along if you’d prefer to.
What Are OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Bard AI?
Take some time to become familiar with both chatbots before looking at usage examples or differences if you’re not already aware of the AI war that is now being fought.
ChatGPT is an AI-based chatbot developed by San Francisco-based OpenAI using their language models. Due to its wide range of capabilities, ChatGPT quickly gained popularity after its introduction. The bot could perform a wide range of tasks thanks to its incredibly powerful GPT-3 model, including creating sophisticated code, outlining articles and stories, offering life advice, simulating hypothetical situations, and much more. The bot gained even more power following the introduction of the new GPT-4 LLM, and it is still quite well-liked today.
Google Bard is an experimental conversational AI service that has long been seen as ChatGPT’s competition. A scaled-down version of the company’s LaMDA language model, which was released a few years ago, serves as the foundation for Bard AI. Bard has been trained by Google using its own data set, which has a few advantages that we shall go over in more detail below. The company guarantees that Bard AI will provide original, high-quality responses that will include some of ChatGPT’s capabilities. Yet whereas Google Bard is still constrained, ChatGPT is accessible to everyone.
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard: Significant Differences
Now that you have a basic understanding of the two chatbots, let’s start discussing their major differences. Many people are considering the argument between ChatGTP and Google Bard. Although each chatbot has unique skills, there are some significant contrasts between the two. They are in order of importance:
1. Coding Expertise
Having ChatGPT code for you has been one of the most popular uses of ChatGPT. The AI chatbot is an expert at creating sophisticated code in a number of different languages. People have used ChatGPT to create games and even complete chatbots, as anyone who has spent enough time on Twitter will attest. The AI chatbot can effortlessly debug many instances of code in addition to producing it.
On the other hand, Google Bard is not yet officially able to code. Google stated on its FAQ website that Bard cannot assist with coding at this time since it has not yet provided support for coding responses. Yet when we attempted to get Bard to code, it produced HTML and Javascript code. We also submitted the same to ChatGPT, though, and it discovered a few mistakes in Bard’s code. After it rectified them organically, the code was then ready for usage. Yet, it is clear that ChatGPT has the advantage in terms of coding.
2. Many Responses
Unless specifically instructed otherwise, ChatGPT always responds with a single output when you ask it a question. The bot may render a variety of versions and can climb as high as the user desires. This standard reaction to questions, nevertheless, could annoy some people.
The Google Bard AI returns various iterations of the same solutions or answers. The AI chatbot refers to them as Drafts and gives users the option to select any of them so they may determine which response best suits their needs. Each draught may have a different source for accuracy depending on how it was written. Users are free to choose any one response or even combine several for the best result. One of the greatest distinctions between ChatGPT and Bard AI is this. This provision is a welcome one since a single response isn’t always the most precise or appropriate.
3. Conversational Memory
These days, a wide range of AI chatbots have conversation retention. For those who are unaware, this effectively means that the chatbot will use your past input as a starting point for future responses. In other words, if you previously asked a bot for a recipe, it may respond to subsequent requests without losing the context. There is a level of dialogue retention in ChatGPT. The model of the AI bot can retain up to 3,000 words from the present exchange. To formulate responses, it is unable to access previous conversations. Yet, it does an excellent job of maintaining the flow.
At the moment, Google Bard struggles to maintain context. After being given a request for knock-knock jokes, Google Bard AI responded with a completely different response. Bard AI’s capacity to retain context has been purposefully restricted for the time being, according to Google. The bot’s contextual awareness should grow as it continues to learn. But, ChatGPT prevails over Bard if you’re seeking for a cut-and-dry decision on this.
4. Access to the Web
The absence of Internet access has always been one of ChatGPT’s main flaws. The AI chatbot uses a dataset with no knowledge of global events that occurred after September 2021, even with its most recent GPT-4 model. Comparatively to bots that can access the Internet like Microsoft Bing AI, this makes the bot more likely to make factual mistakes.
Thankfully, Google Bard has real time connection to the Internet. Bard AI can perform Internet searches and intelligently generate all of your question-related responses, just like Bing. This gives it tremendous capability when it comes to retrieving current information without any significant mistakes. Similar to Bing, Bard AI also provides consumers with a list of URL sources at the bottom (not often, though). Therefore Google Bard AI will be the bot with the most recent responses in the Bard vs. ChatGPT debate.
5. Language Assistance
Even more languages are now supported by ChatGPT’s most recent GPT-4 language model. Almost 26 distinct languages are supported by the most recent LLM. French, Spanish, Arabic, Mandarin, Italian, and a host of other languages are among them. As a result, ChatGPT is a very intelligent bot that speaks pretty effectively in a variety of languages.
Currently, Google Bard only supports American English. Bard’s AI bot thinks it can communicate in other languages today, despite Google’s claims that it is working on making it possible. When asked how many languages it can speak, it gave the same response as below. Google Bard, however, was unable to produce a poem in French, which essentially validated the company’s response. When and which languages are added first will only become clear with time.
6. Delusion
One would assume that Google Bard AI could readily create replies and make no mistakes given the widespread availability of the Internet. Our earlier test on conversation retention, however, blatantly contradicted this. However, Bard AI is highly prone to having delusions and producing incorrect information. Even though it’s not deliberate, the AI can confidently spread false information since it thinks it’s true. For instance, Bard AI cited a recent incidence in response to a question regarding the most recent earthquake in Delhi in 2023. In truth, an earthquake had happened just a few hours prior, and there were internet news reports about it.
Delusions are also common with ChatGPT. The bot’s most recent GPT-4 model, in contrast, asserts that it has reduced delusions by 35% when compared to GPT-3. Numerous users have tested this version, and even in our opinion, ChatGPT has improved and decreased delusions. Yet it’s still not entirely there.
It could be a little early to assume that Bard AI will prevent delusions, though. Since this is the company’s initial version, before it is enhanced, it will go through its own stages of mistakes and delusions. So, as things are, ChatGPT probably has the most accurate model.
7. Giving Sources Credit
AI chatbots typically output their data from datasets, and this is true of all of them. They receive extensive sample material to train on, such as varied messages, chats, photos, and more. As a result, ChatGPT and Bard both have unique datasets from which they get the responses. Google Bard and Bing, two AI bots, have access to the Internet as well. The bots can rephrase information and give it to consumers thanks to a combination of these elements.
Google Bard AI has real-time access to the Internet, yet despite this, it occasionally miscredits sources or even misrepresents its own data. We probed about what Haki is in One Piece during our tests. As predicted, Google Bard AI produced three different manuscripts. Nevertheless, a particular draught Bard had not only verbatim taken text from our own website but also neglected to cite the source. Here, look at this:
Bing AI, on the other hand, analyses content after it has been studied online and then rephrases it. Additionally, it has the decency to cite its sources and provide links to any pieces it may have drawn inspiration from in the footnotes. This is a crucial missing component that Google Bard could fill right away. Although source links were occasionally visible, they were extremely infrequent, and it was disappointing to witness Bard copying stuff in this manner.
Last but not least, despite the fact that ChatGPT is unable to access the Internet, it successfully rephrases information even though it does not share sources. Also, we did not discover any overlap between our articles and those in ChatGPT. In this case, MS Bing AI triumphs when it comes to providing accurate sources.
Google Bard vs. ChatGPT: As it stands, the latter Wins
Although Google provides several benefits, such as Internet access, it is obvious that ChatGPT now has the upper hand. Yet as the Silicon Valley behemoth adds more features and refines its model using data, we can anticipate that to change. We can experiment with ChatGPT’s full power while we wait. ChatGPT is available on Siri and the Apple Watch. There are also a lot of ChatGPT substitutes available that are suitable. So who wins this fight, the AI chatbot? Please share your opinions in the section below.
